Model says nude pictures are not porn

Dream 08-24-2003

R&B singer Blu Cantrell feels no shame at being called a nude model, as she says that her explicit photos from the beginning of her career "aren't porn".

According to rate the music.com, the ‘Breathe’ singer recently signed a one million-dollar deal to pose for Playboy. In the past she has posed in the nude for raunchy magazines.

"I don't have any regrets. I'm not ashamed of them at all. Men still come up to me and compliment them. Those pictures were taken when I had no money to pay the bills. It hasn't been a problem," she says.

"Porn is having sex on film. Nude pictures aren't porn. I don't care what other people think," she says.

Princess-Mia

This is kinda stupid. ad not sure if it is really. If you agree with her that means Hustle and Playboy and Girls gone wild are art. That's just stupid

If you disagree with her you saying that Roman sculptures and paints are porn. Which again is stupid to think that.

SinPhullDreams

Yeah nude photes in Playboy and other stuff like that is porn.. I mean a painting of a nude woman is art it is there to be looked upon as wow nice work,, Nude photes is to be looked upon as wow nice rack and then men take the magazine in the bathroom and do your thing.. They are not seein the tur beauty in the woman form.. Like Roman sculptures, they are art and beauty and in one.. How can you even compare nasty trash like nude playboys to that....

Sugarlipz

Wow this thread is old! I heard about that along time ago and I didn't think anything of it.

wilecoyote

womens bodies are beautiful things to be looked at

blondhercules

one persons art is another persons porn, plaboy has done some very art full pics in there magazine before. i dont see the problem with it.

mrg

Its all in the eye of the beholder


whats porn to some maybe art to others, and vice versa




I thought "porn" was "having sex / or masterbating"

edit reason: I hadnt read blondehercules comment to see that he has the same thought as I.